R. 4:58-2 New Jersey Rules of Court, R. 4:58-2: Consequences of Non-Acceptance of Claimant’s Offer, rendered as code with every cross-reference linked

rule 4:58-2 "Consequences of Non-Acceptance of Claimant’s Offer" {
(a) In cases other than actions against an automobile insurance carrier for uninsured motorist/underinsured motorist benefits, if the offer of a claimant is not accepted and the claimant obtains a money judgment, in an amount that is 120% of the offer or more, excluding allowable prejudgment interest and counsel fees, the claimant shall be allowed, in addition to costs of suit: (1) all reasonable litigation expenses incurred following non-acceptance; (2) prejudgment interest of eight percent on the amount of any money recovery from the date of the offer or the date of completion of discovery, whichever is later, but only to the extent that such prejudgment interest exceeds the interest prescribed by R. 4:42-11(b), which also shall be allowable; and (3) a reasonable attorney's fee for such subsequent services as are compelled by the non-acceptance.
(b) In cases involving actions against automobile carriers for uninsured/underinsured motorist benefits, if the offer of a claimant is not accepted and the claimant obtains a monetary award by jury or non-jury verdict, (adjusted to reflect comparative negligence, if any) in an amount that is 120% of the offer or more, excluding allowable prejudgment interest and counsel fees, the claimant shall be allowed, in addition to costs of suit: (1) all reasonable litigation expenses incurred following non-acceptance; (2) prejudgment interest of eight percent on the amount of any money recovery from the date of the offer or the date of completion of discovery, whichever is later, but only to the extent that such prejudgment interest exceeds the interest prescribed by R. 4:42-11(b), which also shall be allowable; and (3) a reasonable attorney's fee for such subsequent services as are compelled by the non-acceptance.
(c) No allowances shall be granted pursuant to paragraphs (a) or (b) if they would impose undue hardship or otherwise result in unfairness to the offeree. If undue hardship can be eliminated by reducing the allowance to a lower sum, the court shall reduce the amount of the allowance accordingly. The burden is on the offeree to establish the offeree’s claim of undue hardship or lack of fairness.
Note: Amended July 7, 1971 to be effective September 13, 1971; amended July 14, 1972 to be effective September 5, 1972; amended July 17, 1975 to be effective September 8, 1975; amended July 13, 1994 to be effective September 1, 1994; amended July 5, 2000 to be effective September 5, 2000; amended July 28, 2004 to be effective September 1, 2004; text amended and designated as paragraph (a), new paragraph (b) adopted July 27, 2006 to be effective September 1, 2006; paragraph (a) amended July 23, 2010 to be effective September 1, 2010; paragraph (a) amended, new paragraph (b) added, and previous paragraph (b) redesignated as paragraph (c) August 1, 2016 to be effective September 1, 2016; paragraph (c) amended August 5, 2022 to be effective September 1, 2022.
}
referenced_by: 4:58-3, 4:58-4
source: njcourts.gov // verbatim; changed 2025-10-07; corpus harvested 2026-09-02