Rules of Court · Part 1 · New Jersey

R. 1:2-5 New Jersey Rules of Court, R. 1:2-5: Advancement of Cases for Trial or Argument [Deleted June 28, 1996 to be effective September 1, 1996], rendered as code with every cross-reference linked

Advancement of Cases for Trial or Argument [Deleted June 28, 1996 to be effective September 1, 1996]

the rule, verbatim; Code adds line numbers, links on every cross-reference and the list of rules that cite this one

Official Comment to Deleted R. 1:2-5

The deleted rule attempted to accord preference in the scheduling of cases for trial, hearing or argument across trial court and Appellate Division lines. The rule was deleted as the Supreme Court takes the position that the issue of calendar preference is best addressed administratively rather than in the context of court rules. Nonetheless, as a matter of policy, the preferences enumerated in the rule should be looked to as guidelines in determining priority of cases scheduled for trial, hearing or argument in the trial courts and the Appellate Division. These preferences include (1) all contested matters where a principal issue is the custody, status, welfare, and protection of minors; criminal and quasi-criminal cases, election actions, actions(except negligence actions) to which the State, a county, municipality or other public or quasi-public agency is a party; (2) if the action is in a trial court, all cases to be tried without a jury; (3) appeals on leave granted pending in the appellate courts; (4) workers' compensation appeals; and (5) such other cases as any court may from time to time order.

Verbatim rule text, unmarked. Nothing here is a summary.

rule 1:2-5 "Advancement of Cases for Trial or Argument [Deleted June 28, 1996 to be effective September 1, 1996]" {
Official Comment to Deleted R. 1:2-5
The deleted rule attempted to accord preference in the scheduling of cases for trial, hearing or argument across trial court and Appellate Division lines. The rule was deleted as the Supreme Court takes the position that the issue of calendar preference is best addressed administratively rather than in the context of court rules. Nonetheless, as a matter of policy, the preferences enumerated in the rule should be looked to as guidelines in determining priority of cases scheduled for trial, hearing or argument in the trial courts and the Appellate Division. These preferences include (1) all contested matters where a principal issue is the custody, status, welfare, and protection of minors; criminal and quasi-criminal cases, election actions, actions(except negligence actions) to which the State, a county, municipality or other public or quasi-public agency is a party; (2) if the action is in a trial court, all cases to be tried without a jury; (3) appeals on leave granted pending in the appellate courts; (4) workers' compensation appeals; and (5) such other cases as any court may from time to time order.
}
referenced_by: 2:3-3
source: njcourts.gov // verbatim; changed 2025-06-26; corpus harvested 2026-09-02

← R. 1:2-4 · R. 1:2-6 → · chapter 1:2 · all rules

The Rules of Court are a government edict and carry no copyright; the text above is the Judiciary’s own publication, unchanged. Structure, links and highlighting are ours and carry no legal weight. Read the rule on njcourts.gov before you rely on it; amendments take effect each September 1.